Today we went to Medical Oncology and met again with the prostate
cancer team leader. They must have heard of our discomfort about going on
Abiraterone and sent along their best operative!
We’d met this charming fellow last year when he introduced me to two new
drugs that turned out to be absolutely life-changing. So we had very good
rapport and plenty of confidence in him. Especially when he said he was determined
not to try to talk us into accepting a medication we were not quite happy
about.
We canvassed the alternatives: chemo is an option but we had already
decided that was not for us. Targeted radiation on the spine is a possible
option if we don’t do anything else but the recent scans did not suggest that there
was widespread cancer at this stage.
So we turned to Abiraterone. We worked through our dozen or so
questions and were surprised to find that our consultant was a member of the
team that did the first trials on Abiraterone seven years ago in UK. I had read
of these on the internet and had been looking forward to finding more about it
year by year ever since. He’d had extensive experience with hundreds of men using
the drug, not just the limited numbers who have qualified for it in this
country. It was no trouble for him to answer every question with illustrations
out of that experience.
Serious side effects, he said, were virtually non-existent. It became
clear that a lot of our misgivings about side effects and quality of life were,
in his experience, not really appropriate. Benefits in slowing the growth of
the cancer were not great but measurable. Extra life expectancy, yes, is only a matter of months.
We queried him about the advantage of commencing this drug when I have
no significant symptoms of the cancer—beyond a couple of bouts of back pain
recently. The fact that this month’s CT scan didn’t reveal any great advancement
of the cancer in my backbone also made us wonder if this was an appropriate time to
start this kind of medication. His view was that using Abiraterone while I am
in good shape is more likely to give another year or two of good quality of
life than delaying it until I need more frequent medication for pain.
Also, we found that we can control the amount of medication I take and
he mentioned some ways in which I could get extra benefit from what I do take.
And he thought that, if it turned out to be reasonably efficacious, we might
plan for a course of up to twelve months. It would not be for ever. Indeed, he
said, if the cure seemed to me to be worse than the disease, I could stop at
any time.
He said that in selecting the limited number of men who may be suitable
for this expensive medication, his team take into account the specific elements
of the patient’s cancer and overall lifestyle. He reminded me that my cancer is
only 7 out of 10 on the Gleason scale so it seems to offer a realistic target
for further hormone treatment. He also suggested that my lifestyle, general
fitness, knowledge and attitude would seem to make me a better candidate for
the drug than many men half my age.
He even challenged me with the thought that it would be a good thing if
the drug enabled me to continue to speak out about the issues of life and death
which are becoming more and more part of my own personal experience. (Flattery
will get you everywhere, I thought—but I will think about standing for the somewhat
dysfunctional Village Residents’ Committee!)
As have all my friends, he urged us to keep the massive cost of this
drug out of our deliberations. My ethical concerns about the disproportionate
amount of the country’s Health budget that is spent on people at and above my
age remain. But I know that if I decline this offer it will not actually make
much difference to the health prospects of middle aged men with prostate cancer
and it certainly won’t provide breakfast for a few more school children.
Certainly, life —and the NZ State—owe me nothing. At my birthday last
week I passed the average life expectancy of NZ males. And we know that men
with Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (MCRPC) generally die within
two years—I am halfway through that period already. In a sense we have nothing
to lose. And perhaps I still have some good reasons to remain active and well.
So we have accepted a prescription and will make a start.
But chemo? — forget it!
No comments:
Post a Comment